Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

Sunday with The Times

I've been enjoying a subscription to the New York Times this year. I'm not spending an hour a day combing through it, but I do manage to check in a few times a week and see what their headlines are and what their op-ed folks are saying. It's valuable, though I have to admit it helps keep my worldview on the negative side.

Exhibit A: Why Bambi Must Go
In an op-ed piece, a professor of biology at William & Mary notes that the decline in many migratory bird species such as certain warblers is due to the overly successful management of forests for maximum populations of white-tailed deer. The deer reach population densities up to 75 per square mile, and eat every piece of greenery they can reach, which destroys the nesting habitat of warblers that nest low to the ground, such as hooded and Canada warblers. The professor's suggestion is to stop managing for deer (and deer hunters), something that I'm sure will not be embraced by the armies that hit the woods for two weeks every November. Yet another example of humans meddling in the affairs of critters, resulting in unintended consequences, to my mind.

Exhibit B: The Beginning of the End of the Census?
The House of Representatives have voted in support of legislation that would kill off the American Community Survey, an adjunct to the constitutionally mandated decennial census that collects a wide variety of economic and sociological data on the U.S. population. This data fills so many needs of businesses, researchers, and government policy makers and affects everyone. But, according to the ironically named Daniel Webster, first-term GOP representative from Florida, it is too big an intrusion into the homes of Americans, and costs too much to boot. Apparently he even uses ACS data on his own website; it is not known what he will do if he is successful and no longer has access to current data.

Exhibit C: Of Bile and Billionaires
Regular NYT columnist Frank Bruni starts with the story of the SuperPAC funder who wanted to bring President Obama's former association with Rev. Jeremiah Wright back into the news in an attack ad (which, even though the ad has been canceled, was successful in reminding us of the former association). Bruni eventually says what I realized a while ago, that political discourse from almost all sides has degenerated into "bile instead of reason, catcalls in place of conversation, and the basest of instincts." I would say one can't have a functional society if you can't talk to each other reasonably. Bruni at least finds some solace in that voters seem to be fed up with the nonsense too.

Those who would control us would rather we just listen to the boilerplate positive spin they put on what they talk about and not ask further questions. I'm glad that there are still some journalists who are asking questions and telling us what They don't want us to know.



( 4 comments — Leave a comment )
May. 20th, 2012 07:06 pm (UTC)
I wish there was an alternative to having politics and politicians.

Maybe in the future, someone will create a race of super-powerful robots like Gort from THE DAY THE EARTH STOOD STILL. And they'll patrol all over and stop crime and injustice and stuff.

That would be awesome, you know?
May. 22nd, 2012 04:31 pm (UTC)
I never watch enough movies, so I don't know much about The Day the Earth Stood Still. But maybe Gort and his kind could keep us in line. As long as they weren't programmed by fallible humans.

Oh. Wait.

The worst part is, it's very difficult to get the right kind of people into politics. Who wants to be dragged down into the mud? Only someone who's already used to it.
May. 21st, 2012 01:42 am (UTC)
The Super-PAC's are a huge problem. Thank you Supreme Court!
There was mucho misinformation already and now it has deep pockets.
May. 22nd, 2012 04:27 pm (UTC)
Re: Elections
I can only agree. I just wonder, even with all the people saying the Super-PACs are a problem, maybe there are many more silent people who think it's ok? After all, we let mega-corporations determine what entertains us and nourishes us. What if the Supreme Court just went with what the majority thought was OK? You know they could've found legal precedent to support throwing out SuperPACs if they wanted to.

Yeah, I know, it's kinda dark in my little heart sometimes.
( 4 comments — Leave a comment )

Latest Month

December 2017


Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Lilia Ahner